All information provided is for entertainment only and no one makes any representations as to accuracy, completeness, currentness, suitability, or validity of any information on this site and will not be liable for any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its display or use.
Offline

Good luck!! 👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼
Offline
lydia delainey wrote:
Getmommieouttathabox wrote:
And who signs a contract and doesn't realize it says if you don't do x by date y you owe the money back?? Did she not read it? Sounds like a necessary clause with her anyway.
From the way she was talking, she has been the one letting someone enjoy benefits at her expense, and now that a certain time has been reached, she is no longer covering their expenses, and that person is refusing to pay. I'm just clarifying-not sure if you think Tay is the one that owes money....
I heard the whole convo with Robert Verdi and I'd like to make 2 clarifications.
1. Taylor referred to the other person as a 'she'.
2. It's not Taylor who isn't holding up her end of the bargain. (LOL...obviously after reading #1!)
Robert asked her to specify a dollar amount as he had gone into great detail in his story, but Taylor kindly refrained from doing so. She said she needed to wait to see what happened first.
I'm so dense...I had much smaller visions of what might be going on. Like I thought someone was using her Netflix account and didn't pay. LOL. I never jumped to anything as big as SoHo House. But then again, who the hell would sue someone for not paying their part of stealing your Netflix (that was ME using stealing...not Taylor!! She never said that!!!)
Also, I honestly don't think Taylor or Brett would ever sue each other. Seriously. I would never put it past her to sue someone ELSE in his family, but I don't think he would let that happen. But I really think she has too much respect and dare I say love for him still that she would do that.
I have no theories...I'm not that smart. But I did listen to the segment! Carry on!
Offline

From their site, sounds like it would be hard for the bill to be an issue for either Brett or his fam/friends.
BILLSAll bills must be settled in full before leaving the House. There are no credit facilities. Members are responsible for their guests’ bills if they are
not paid.
Last edited by FKFriday (3/24/2016 4:45 pm)
Offline
FKCSTMom wrote:
lydia delainey wrote:
Getmommieouttathabox wrote:
And who signs a contract and doesn't realize it says if you don't do x by date y you owe the money back?? Did she not read it? Sounds like a necessary clause with her anyway.
From the way she was talking, she has been the one letting someone enjoy benefits at her expense, and now that a certain time has been reached, she is no longer covering their expenses, and that person is refusing to pay. I'm just clarifying-not sure if you think Tay is the one that owes money....
I heard the whole convo with Robert Verdi and I'd like to make 2 clarifications.
1. Taylor referred to the other person as a 'she'.
2. It's not Taylor who isn't holding up her end of the bargain. (LOL...obviously after reading #1!)
Robert asked her to specify a dollar amount as he had gone into great detail in his story, but Taylor kindly refrained from doing so. She said she needed to wait to see what happened first.
I'm so dense...I had much smaller visions of what might be going on. Like I thought someone was using her Netflix account and didn't pay. LOL. I never jumped to anything as big as SoHo House. But then again, who the hell would sue someone for not paying their part of stealing your Netflix (that was ME using stealing...not Taylor!! She never said that!!!)
Also, I honestly don't think Taylor or Brett would ever sue each other. Seriously. I would never put it past her to sue someone ELSE in his family, but I don't think he would let that happen. But I really think she has too much respect and dare I say love for him still that she would do that.
I have no theories...I'm not that smart. But I did listen to the segment! Carry on!
I did say in an earlier quote that it sounded like she was mediating through Brett, but that it was a 3rd party(that's why I thought it might be Brett's sister). I agree Tay and Brett would never sue one another.
Offline
You guys really think he'd let her sue his sister and not just pay it to be done with it?
Offline
She said that with his negotiation skills, he should be able to work it out. I think the lawsuit is just a threat.
Offline

Getmommieouttathabox wrote:
You guys really think he'd let her sue his sister and not just pay it to be done with it?
Not at all. None of that family are having money issues, a few nights at the club is not going to blow up into a huge deal.
If the sisters like it there so much, they have pretty good grounds to get them selves in and can't imagine not paying a bill to spite Taylor, and ruin their own chances.
Offline
FKFriday wrote:
Getmommieouttathabox wrote:
You guys really think he'd let her sue his sister and not just pay it to be done with it?
Not at all. None of that family are having money issues, a few nights at the club is not going to blow up into a huge deal.
If the sisters like it there so much, they have pretty good grounds to get them selves in and can't imagine not paying a bill to spite Taylor, and ruin their own chances.
But don't you have to be in some sort of creative field to be a member at SOHO House? I don't know what they do, but I'm not sure any of them have grounds to get a membership for themselves.
Offline
FKFriday wrote:
I thought they designed swim clothes?
Could be! I honestly have no clue.
Offline

Memberships are also a yearly based thing, there is no automatic renewal. While you don't have to reapply, a committee does decide if you can stay another year, or you could just say you don't want to.
If the expense is too much for her, she doesn't have to stay a member, and if she's not using the facilities, I can see them not allowing her to renew.
Spouses are also not automatically members. If Brett didn't get his own membership, he would need to go in as someone's guest, and you can only be in there as a guest while they member is there. That totally wasn't happening lol
Offline
La maree is the sisters swim line. I'm sure that's creative enough to get their own membership.
Offline
Wakeupfan420 wrote:
We have joint checking/savings, both our paycheck a go in and bills and other spending comes out of that. I take care of all the finances (making sure bills are paid on time, etc) because I'm better with money and because my hubby works out of town 2 weeks at a time. He makes way more money than I do, but I also keep the household running, cook, clean, care for the dogs, have a side business and work FT. It basically evens itself out that we are both contributing equally, his happens to be more financial, mine is mundane daily life stuff lol. We don't really think of his money and my money, it's just our money.
Ditto for us! Both of us had been married before when we met (we are celebrating our 20th this summer) but his lasted only a year and mine longer with 2 kids. When we got married, we both made about the same money and until I recently retired, we were basically parallel the entire time (which I think makes a difference in the scenarios described). I might have made more at times, but who cared. We have always considered ourselves a team at everything we do. When we got married, we sold one house, kept one (as a rental) and bought one as ours. And since it's all been joint.
I think as long as it works for you, it doesn't matter. I never agreed personally with how Taylor was doing it because I couldn't wrap my head around spending all of my money on shopping and fun and using my husband's to pay the bills. I think it was more of her attitude. Do you the other longtime listeners remember that she ALSO had huge credit card debt at the same time? I'm not sure if that was from before she met Brett or not...but I do remember Kenny talking to her about how to pay it down, etc. Who knows....
I also was quite sad for her when Brett would only buy her one shoe....and she had to buy the other. Ouch.
Offline
I think the arrangement worked to benefit the both of them. This way Brett was not footing the bill for massive shopping sprees on a credit card attached to his name. Assuming Brett could not trust Taylor with money. This keeps him in control of the finances and and his credit safe.
Offline
I'll take up for Brett a little on this one. When he bought the louboutins they had only been dating a short time ( a year or so I think) so I can understand him not wanting to spend $700 on shoes. Plus, they're shoes. He was smart with money and from the way Taylor talked he didn't like to spend money on frivolous things.
Offline
FKFriday wrote:
meepmeep wrote:
Who asked for money and for what? Can you fill me in please? I listened this morning and I felt bad for Kenny. I don't think he realized that something was wrong when he first asked. Taylor seemed fine during the 7 things. It seemed like something happened right after the 7 things. I'm going to listen again though.
A bunch of women were getting ready for a wedding and one had her hair and makeup done, but then didn't have cash (assumed she could use a card) to pay. She borrowed $50 from Taylor, and never paid her back. Taylor never asked for it.
somebody else said it so i'll repeat. I tried to think hindsight how I would have said it. didn't tay say the girl was blowing up her phone with texts about the $90? I would have just texted, "you want me to go ahead and subtract the $50 from it?" easier to be assertive via text
Then there was a group dinner and Taylor had to leave early for a meeting. She said to same woman, can you cover my portion and I'll repay you? It wound up being $90 (sounds like Tay only had an app, but then had to split the whole meal) and the woman kept harassing her for the money. Taylor finally gave her the $90, Robert brought up that she should have just given her $40 and called it a day.
Offline
timetowakeup wrote:
FKFriday wrote:
meepmeep wrote:
Who asked for money and for what? Can you fill me in please? I listened this morning and I felt bad for Kenny. I don't think he realized that something was wrong when he first asked. Taylor seemed fine during the 7 things. It seemed like something happened right after the 7 things. I'm going to listen again though.
A bunch of women were getting ready for a wedding and one had her hair and makeup done, but then didn't have cash (assumed she could use a card) to pay. She borrowed $50 from Taylor, and never paid her back. Taylor never asked for it.
I couldn't afford friends or restaurants like that especially as she said she only had appetizers cause she was there a short time.
somebody else said it so i'll repeat. I tried to think hindsight how I would have said it. didn't tay say the girl was blowing up her phone with texts about the $90? I would have just texted, "you want me to go ahead and subtract the $50 from it?" easier to be assertive via text
Then there was a group dinner and Taylor had to leave early for a meeting. She said to same woman, can you cover my portion and I'll repay you? It wound up being $90 (sounds like Tay only had an app, but then had to split the whole meal) and the woman kept harassing her for the money. Taylor finally gave her the $90, Robert brought up that she should have just given her $40 and called it a day.
Offline

Getmommieouttathabox wrote:
La maree is the sisters swim line. I'm sure that's creative enough to get their own membership.
ehhh? idk. How many people are "designers"? If that was the only requirement anyone with a little bit of money to throw into a good looking website could get it? And if your getting into the SOHO house you better have a little bit of money.
Offline
Zara81 wrote:
I'll take up for Brett a little on this one. When he bought the louboutins they had only been dating a short time ( a year or so I think) so I can understand him not wanting to spend $700 on shoes. Plus, they're shoes. He was smart with money and from the way Taylor talked he didn't like to spend money on frivolous things.
Are you sure?? I thought they were married? I really only 'remember' the show clearly from when they got engaged and since then. I started listening before that but not as consistently. It seems like the shoe thing came after the wedding.
I guess my point was he could afford it...it was something she REALLY wanted... But for him to say, "I love you..I'm marrying/married to you but I'll only buy you half of your present." I think it's a dick move. He flew off helicopter skiing and on golf vacations all of the time... How is that not frivolous too? Just sayin' I don't have Louboutins but I'd have a problem with the way that was handled.
Offline

FKCSTMom wrote:
Zara81 wrote:
I'll take up for Brett a little on this one. When he bought the louboutins they had only been dating a short time ( a year or so I think) so I can understand him not wanting to spend $700 on shoes. Plus, they're shoes. He was smart with money and from the way Taylor talked he didn't like to spend money on frivolous things.
Are you sure?? I thought they were married? I really only 'remember' the show clearly from when they got engaged and since then. I started listening before that but not as consistently. It seems like the shoe thing came after the wedding.
I guess my point was he could afford it...it was something she REALLY wanted... But for him to say, "I love you..I'm marrying/married to you but I'll only buy you half of your present." I think it's a dick move. He flew off helicopter skiing and on golf vacations all of the time... How is that not frivolous too? Just sayin' I don't have Louboutins but I'd have a problem with the way that was handled.
I totally agree with you!! HE decided what was frivolous.
Offline
piopio12 wrote:
FKCSTMom wrote:
Zara81 wrote:
I'll take up for Brett a little on this one. When he bought the louboutins they had only been dating a short time ( a year or so I think) so I can understand him not wanting to spend $700 on shoes. Plus, they're shoes. He was smart with money and from the way Taylor talked he didn't like to spend money on frivolous things.
Are you sure?? I thought they were married? I really only 'remember' the show clearly from when they got engaged and since then. I started listening before that but not as consistently. It seems like the shoe thing came after the wedding.
I guess my point was he could afford it...it was something she REALLY wanted... But for him to say, "I love you..I'm marrying/married to you but I'll only buy you half of your present." I think it's a dick move. He flew off helicopter skiing and on golf vacations all of the time... How is that not frivolous too? Just sayin' I don't have Louboutins but I'd have a problem with the way that was handled.I totally agree with you!! HE decided what was frivolous.
I'm 99% sure it was when they were just dating. In fact, I think it was their first year living together. I can see both sides honestly... but I do tend to lean more to the side of yes, he should have just bought them since he could obviously afford it.
Offline
Yes, I think it happened before they were married. I do think it was a bit controlling, because I remember Tay saying that he said that it wasn't about the $, but more about the fact that he thought one shouldn't spend that much on shoes specifically. But it was what she wanted, and if he wasn't opposed to spending that much, why not just give her what she wanted.
Offline
They were just dating. Not engaged. Maybe he said no bc he was used to girlfriends seeing he had money and just wanting him to buy things maybe he saw that t spent uncontrollably and was already demanding super pricey things so early on... if I had a son I would hope he isn't buy girls $800 shoes within a couple months of dating.... Moreover I'd hope they wouldn't be so self righteous as to demand that for a gift. My mom tells me exactly what she wants for gifts right down to the color. It's annoying as can be. Hints fine but at some point it becomes so demanding. Go buy it yourself. It feels like it happened while they were married bc after all the ones he did buy her and the Chanel bags and the huge engagement ring she still harped on that shit on air for years....
Last edited by Getmommieouttathabox (3/29/2016 11:24 am)
Offline

Getmommieouttathabox wrote:
They were just dating. Not engaged. Maybe he said no bc he was used to girlfriends seeing he had money and just wanting him to buy things maybe he saw that t spent uncontrollably and was already demanding super pricey things so early on... if I had a son I would hope he isn't buy girls $800 shoes within a couple months of dating.... Moreover I'd hope they wouldn't be so self righteous as to demand that for a gift. My mom tells me exactly what she wants for gifts right down to the color. It's annoying as can be. Hints fine but at some point it becomes so demanding. Go buy it yourself. It feels like it happened while they were married bc after all the ones he did buy her and the Chanel bags and the huge engagement ring she still harped on that shit on air for years....
It always blew me away. One that she would ask for them, 2, that he would split them with her. I couldn't do that sort of relationship and would be mortified for a friend if they told me that had happened to them.
Offline
Getmommieouttathabox wrote:
They were just dating. Not engaged. Maybe he said no bc he was used to girlfriends seeing he had money and just wanting him to buy things maybe he saw that t spent uncontrollably and was already demanding super pricey things so early on... if I had a son I would hope he isn't buy girls $800 shoes within a couple months of dating.... Moreover I'd hope they wouldn't be so self righteous as to demand that for a gift. My mom tells me exactly what she wants for gifts right down to the color. It's annoying as can be. Hints fine but at some point it becomes so demanding. Go buy it yourself. It feels like it happened while they were married bc after all the ones he did buy her and the Chanel bags and the huge engagement ring she still harped on that shit on air for years....
Well said. I totally see that side of it too. Personally, I would never ask for that kind of gift, whether dating or married, and no matter the wealth of my partner. I find it spoiled.
Offline
Did any hear her voice cracking like she was crying when she was talking about Nicole and loving housewives she hates. BTW She totally said, she ended her best-friendship over the housewives.
Offline

I think that his lifestyle and the people he hung out with made Taylor feel it was necessary to have shoes that expensive? I don't think Nicole or the ICHOes were like you need the shoes.
Offline
PRECISELY wrote:
Did any hear her voice cracking like she was crying when she was talking about Nicole and loving housewives she hates. BTW She totally said, she ended her best-friendship over the housewives.
Wow, that's crazy. I totally missed that
Offline

Listening to today's show and Taylor telling the story about how she had a friend with a drug problem and said she hated the guy her friend was dating at her engagement party because he would be a bad influence with her & drugs. She said "I ended up going out to dinner with him and he ended up being great. But he can still be a FUCKING ASSHOLE still". My theory-was she talking about Matt & Nicole? I remember her saying she needed to move out of a very bad living situation before she moved in with Brett. Maybe she is referencing a drug problem Nicole had? Don't want to make an accusations! Just got me thinking...
Offline
I side with Brett on the louboutins. He probably wanted to make sure Taylor loved him for him, not his money. It's tacky to buy your newish girlfriend louboutins (imo). and the fact that she was probably demanding them in the exact color, style, etc. it probably annoyed him and took the fun out of gift giving. So he got stubborn and instead of catering to her selfishness, he stood his ground. Good for Brett.