All information provided is for entertainment only and no one makes any representations as to accuracy, completeness, currentness, suitability, or validity of any information on this site and will not be liable for any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its display or use.
1 of 1- Brown
- legit member
Offline 
Which app gives better post reactions, manual or automated
Because my last post flopped with zero traction, I ended up testing both approaches back to back. Manual reactions trickled in over three days, automated ones hit within an hour. So which actually signals better to the algorithm long-term?
- Gregory
- new/might not be legit
Offline
Re: Which app gives better post reactions, manual or automated
I recently compared two manually launched campaigns and found that engagement rates were better maintained after 72 hours. Activity spikes with automated campaigns tend to level off quickly, at least in my experience with B2B content. The initial spike looks impressive, but then it fades.
- Norman
- wuwt fan status
Offline
Re: Which app gives better post reactions, manual or automated
After completely abandoning the planned tools, the publication's reach increased. Likes appeared more slowly but stayed in the feed longer. If your budget is limited, there are ways to get free audience engagement without spending anything. For example, check out the opportunities here You can also earn points for your activity on LinkedIn. Real users, not bots, are more important than numbers when the platform analyzes signals.