Wakeupfan420 wrote:

Wakeupfan1602 wrote:

I don't recall any one saying it was "disgusting" when people on this board were speculating about her...why the double standard? 

 
I see what you're saying, but this board is basically unknown unless you're looking for it, it's a far cry from doing it on a satellite radio show in my opinion. We're talking amongst ourselves, not to a national audience. No one went on FB or called into the show to ask her, we waited for her to make that announcement because we're really not assholes, I promise!

 
Geez 420, stop reading my mind already. 😋

I'm just not a fan of the Friday co-host. What do you guys think?

I like Emma. She has a dry humour. She's not as high energy, but she has some interesting stories. It's kind of a genius idea to have this rotation of co-hosts. Each one offers something different, so it keeps things interesting. My spidey senses are telling me that Clay will be the new permanent Tues co-host. We can hope, anyway.

*Warning* not to get political up in here but I was just thinking how Taylor used to say "if your against gay marriage don't get gay married" and I know that used to upset/annoy people but hear me out. I was talking to a friend and her taxes went up as they do, and she reading the list and she said "$2000 for school! I don't have kids that go to school. I don't even have kids!" Which got me thinking with this whole republicans don't want to fund planned parenthood because they offer abortions even though tax dollars don't actually fund those (supposedly I'm not an expert). It made me think ok well Taylor logic would be to say "don't have an abortion" but then back to what my friend said she doesn't have kids why are her tax dollars funding public school?? It just seems nowadays people are suggesting we have more freedom towards what our tax dollars get spent on which I don't disagree with but at what point does the bleeding stop? It's a battle for everything! We can't agree on public or private school dollars, health care, and  many more! Should each citizen just get a check list of what rights they would like each year? Clean water, check! Protection for endangered species, check! Maternity care, nope! (Example only ;) ) *Statements made above are for example only and do not reflect the opinion of the author of this text or owner of this site*

since someone else brought up politics, i need to ask a question. 

Why was there such a push, then crash and burn to repeal ACA last week? like why did in HAVE to happen last week, and since it didn't it's over (which I'm sure it's not really). Why couldn't they just go back to the drawing board and see what everyones demands were and see if they could make it work? Do bills have a finite time they can be discussed about, or they are shelved? 

Pio- My opinion is that the republicans spent the last 7 years (and Trump spent his entire campaign) trying to convince the population that the ACA was horrible and that if we only have them a chance to repeal and replace it, that everyone would be better off. Unfortunately the replacement they presented to their voters would actually give them less coverage at a *much* higher out of pocket cost, once again giving tax breaks to those who are already doing well on the backs of the most vulnerable (veterans, the poor and the elderly). The constituents, including Trump voters, have been making their voices heard since they released their plan, and congressional republicans now realize that if they vote yes on this bill, then they have to actually own it, and be accountable for that vote that would hurt so many of their voters. Their jobs are on the line in 2018 and they are scared shitless that they'll lose their seat if they go through with this madness. Trump is too much of an egomaniac to "lose" so instead he pulled the bill from going to a vote.

lydia delainey wrote:

I'm really hoping this girl with no job is not going to be a regular co-host. I really can't handle the valley girl/vocal fry.

 
I just came to see the opinions on her. She is terrible, and I don't like who Taylor is with her.

And, how can you talk about Val Kilmer movies without mentioning Top Gun?!?

When I hear her voice I keep picturing girl with no job as Hannah from girls and not in a good way!

Last edited by ThatWholeBrevityThang (3/28/2017 8:15 am)

lydia delainey wrote:

When she said someone was in the running for co-host who had been on the show, I think she might have meant her-she's been on a couple times as a guest. Ugh! I might comment on their fb page. They seemed to have responded to listener feedback on some of the other co-hosts...

 
Do it!

I checked out her instagram, and she has a pic of her gorgeous luxury apartment with an unbelievable view, and I'm just shocked that someone who doesn't have a job can live like that.

lydia delainey wrote:

And I know I sound old and out of touch(I'm in my 40s), but why are we celebrating someone who does nothing just because they're "insta" famous. She is so full of herself, talking about how people treated her before they realized "who she was", and how she was so annoyed by Clay Aiken because he wanted her to post or retweet or whatever for him. Get over yourself.

 
Let me preface this by saying I 100% agree with you.

Before I saw everyone's posts here, my initial reaction to her was "puh-leez, your "job" is Instagram? That's ridiculous." I tried to tell myself not to be so judgy, and, at least financially, this girl is much more successful than Taylor who actually gets up and does a radio show every day so maybe she does "work". And for that matter, more financially successful than me with my very "real" job (accounting). She didn't just wake up to 2.5M followers one day, she had to do something to get there, right? Or not? I really don't know that much about her- does she come from money? Did she just get lucky?

She must come from money. Super slouthy, DB, get in it and figure out what her parents do.

Thanks!

Do y'all think that Matt is making Taylor have her on? Seems they may be from the same circle?

Durst_Burp wrote:

piopio12 wrote:

She must come from money. Super slouthy, DB, get in it and figure out what her parents do.

I wasn't interested enough in this girl to dig, but since you asked...

I only watched about the first 1/3 of this because I got bored, but apparently Claudia is one of a group of sisters who all do the same thing and work together to get some sort of synergy between the accounts. They talk about what their "work days" look like.
http://www.lafemmecollective.com/features//facebook-live-qa-with-the-oshry-sisters

Then there's this...its a little more interesting. Keep reading until about halfway down - apparently they do come from (shady) money.
https://gomiblog.com/forums/instagram/oshry-sisters-steens/



 

I hate to say I told you so, but...💁🏼
 

Yea not a fan of this girl with no job. I'm not following her on insta but what exactly does she sell? Hair vitamins? Sunglasses? Is she funny or something? She annoyed me. She was better then Emma who is half asleep on air.