All information provided is for entertainment only and no one makes any representations as to accuracy, completeness, currentness, suitability, or validity of any information on this site and will not be liable for any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its display or use.
Offline
Colleagues, a question about vetting suppliers. We've had mixed results with rendering vendors - first project excellent, then quality drifted as they presumably passed work to junior staff. Now trying to be smarter about selection. What actually indicates a studio will deliver consistently rather than just having a nice portfolio? Genuinely interested in how others assess this.
Offline
Good day. That drift is frustratingly common, usually a capacity problem. Few things I look at now: how long the studio has operated, whether their portfolio shows consistent quality across many projects rather than a few showpieces, and whether they'll tell you who's actually assigned to your project. A serious 3d architectural visualization studio won't dodge that question. The one we use has been running since 2012 with a business client focus, and consistency has held across several projects. Also worth asking to see recent work rather than the curated portfolio - recent output tells you what you'll actually receive, portfolios show what they achieved on their best day.