* g i g g l e *

Durst_Burp wrote:

SewerDick wrote:

Durst_Burp wrote:

Looks like Taylor's old FB account is gone now.

She had four accounts under her name?!

Lol yep - her personal account, two "professional" accounts as Taylor Strecker, and the show account.

All four of those are still up.
I thought you meant she had a fourth "Taylor Strecker" account; I didn't count the WUWT page.
 

Wakeupfan420 wrote:

Beibersbutthole wrote:

museammmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

 
For someone who talks for a living, why can she not pronounce any-fucking-thing correctly??? Ugh it's driving me nuts! Mue-zamm?? #wtf

Several people in the city and Hudson Valley area pronounce it that way.
Museum, penguin, and compass are the repeat offenders of the area.

museum = mew-ZEMM
penguin = PAIN-gwen
compass = KAHM-pess
 

Take it easy, Trace.

timetowakeup wrote:

Durst_Burp wrote:

Just finished yesterday's show. Again with the boyfriend stealing sister story. The fact that she is still talking about the E sisters on an almost daily basis a year and a half post divorce tells me that Taylor is still not a happy person.

one might presume that our almost daily criticism of what Tay does or doesn't do is indicative of our own lack of happiness?
 

ring-a-ding ding-ding dong!

chelchel wrote:

You can dislike her, hate her, love her, not understand her but you can't diagnose her with anything. To some degree, she is playing a character so as much as we'd like to think we KNOW her, we only see a side of her. She is likely very multifaceted, just like we all are.

Well said -- very much agree with this. As an educator, I see this in my own personality transformation within the classroom or with parents. I stand firm knowing I remain my true self within the workplace, but it is true that I do shift into this character, 'performing' in front of an audience. It's a balanced paradox of subconscious subtleties with postured performances, and it's in all of us. I applied (auditioned) for this position (character) and now work (perform) in this field (stage),

WeddingBitch wrote:

FKFriday wrote:

WeddingBitch wrote:

And why would TD include her as plus one if they are just friends.. Oh god I have a headache now.

Especially if she is wanting to meet someone. Odds are gonna go way down if you keep bringing another woman to events.
 

Yes. Again, this feels like bizarro world to me. None of it makes sense. We make sense!

You all might make sense to each other, but you are all still very one-sided.

Why include her as a plus one if they are only friends? Possibly because Taylor is still freshly divorced, still an emotional wreck, and openly admits she prefers to stay snuggled at home with Netflix than walk a block to get coffee. When this happens, our true friends do what they can to pull us out of a seemingly bottomless hole of recovery; this would include taking Taylor to family gatherings or weddings, seeing as it is the season.

Going to events with a woman does not drastically decrease the chances of meeting someone. A wing man is a wing man, no matter the gender, age, or sexual preference. Gauging the playing field and meeting someone is loads easier with a friend or friends in the mix. 

Not everyone posts photos/info of their love life. Several instead prefer to post photos/info of that which lights up their life, including pets, family, landscapes, food, and even their same-sex-best friend who brings joy and a delightful lightness when that often feels lacking when recovering from a long term relationship -- especially a relationship Taylor has said changed her into someone she did not, in hindsight, recognize. 

Figuring out who you really are is a daunting task at any age, but it is fucking terrifying as you get older. Some do it well by being alone -- others need the support and drag-my-ass-out-of-the-house-when-I-get-insular assistance that comes best from friends.

DestinationAwesometown wrote:

 
I can't help but to envision a bunch of little people walking around an office building when I hear/read WeWorks.

S A M E ! Fits of giggles. 

 

MyMindsTellingMeNo wrote:

Dr. Streckaaa in the shot too.

That's Papa Donohue, not Strecker.

FKCSTMom wrote:

SewerDick wrote:

FKCSTMom wrote:

I thought that (she might be dating a Pig Beach guy) but if that were the case, why (at 33) would she have been sharing a Murphy bed with her friend who was a 'she' at the wedding of a Pig Beach guy? When she told the story, she clearly said, "My friend didn't know I wasn't paying attention when SHE pulled it down and it hit me in the head."

What is odd, wrong, or speculative about sharing a bed with your friend at 33?

 

Well I never said anything was WRONG with it and I never will. I was just making a point from a story she was telling. I also don't think it's odd or speculative... Although I honestly would only share a bed with my husband or sister by that age. Even my son was uncomfortable (rightly so...). But you are turning the story into more than what it was...just the fact she was at the wedding of Pig Beach guys sharing room with girls (when we were discussing her dating Pig Beach guys).

In no way am I "turning the story into more than was it was."

You stated: I thought that (she might be dating a Pig Beach guy) but if that were the case, why (at 33) would she have been sharing a Murphy bed with her friend who was a 'she' at the wedding of a Pig Beach guy?"

My focus is not on the "Pig Beach guy" but rather "(at 33)."

With that inclusion, your tone projects negativity towards women-of-a-certain-age sharing a bed with another woman.

If you would like me to focus on the "Pig Beach guy," then here it is: If Taylor is dating a "Pig Beach guy," that does not mean she must spend the night with him while out of town. From what we've seen, Taylor is not the type of lady to abandon her best friend to bed a dude.

E D I T : Formatting

Ba da bingo 24 wrote:

ChickenFacenook wrote:

I liked Taylor's outfit but not TD's. I think the picture is fine. I've been in pictures like that if I go someplace with a close friends family. A vacation for example. But that said, they're absolutely a couple. For various obvious reasons. I don't even think it's a secret. I just don't think she talks about it on air.

 
Could you elaborate on the various obvious reasons?

Yes, do please elaborate, as I do not see anything obvious other than good people including Taylor in their family photo.

If TD was a heterosexual woman, presently dating a man, would there be the same speculation?
What if instead of TD it was Stassi?
Would we assume they are lovers?

Women of all ages are very close to their dear girlfriends and treat each other as family.
My dearest friend calls my mother "mom."
She and I call each other "sister."
She's my family.
Not my lover.