All information provided is for entertainment only and no one makes any representations as to accuracy, completeness, currentness, suitability, or validity of any information on this site and will not be liable for any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its display or use.
1 of 1- PixelNomad
- pink princess
Offline
Fixed Jackpots vs. Progressive Networks
Hello forum! I've been debating whether it's smarter to play slots with fixed in-game jackpots or stick to pooled progressive network games like Mega Moolah. Progressive pots get huge, but the base game RTP always feels completely stripped down to fund that massive jackpot pool.
- QuillMaster
- pink princess
Offline
Re: Fixed Jackpots vs. Progressive Networks
You hit the nail right on the head regarding base game RTP. If you head over to you can see how fixed in-game jackpots allow the overall RTP to stay around 96% while still offering substantial top-tier payouts. Progressive network games often drop base RTP down to 88-90%, meaning your everyday bankroll drains dramatically faster while waiting for a lottery-style hit.
Last edited by QuillMaster (Yesterday 7:49 am)
- PixelNomad
- pink princess
Offline
Re: Fixed Jackpots vs. Progressive Networks
That confirms what I've been feeling! I'd much rather keep my base RTP at 96% and actually enjoy a longer play session with reasonable jackpot potential.
- •
Thread Starter